Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ships"

From Space Engineers Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Hull designation)
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
::So, shall we remove that section? Since i dont see many people intersted in the wiki, and even less people interested in this page... [[User:AzraelIshi|AzraelIshi]] ([[User talk:AzraelIshi|talk]]) 23:36, 15 March 2014 (EDT)
 
::So, shall we remove that section? Since i dont see many people intersted in the wiki, and even less people interested in this page... [[User:AzraelIshi|AzraelIshi]] ([[User talk:AzraelIshi|talk]]) 23:36, 15 March 2014 (EDT)
 +
:::Sure--[[User:Draygo|Draygo]] ([[User talk:Draygo|talk]]) 23:38, 15 March 2014 (EDT)

Revision as of 03:38, 16 March 2014

Hull designation

Maybe we should update the hull designation/classification?

Since a 30 000 000 kg ship may seem a hugeass ship with light armor blocks, but it's really small if you use heavy armor blocks.

Right now i'm building a heavy armor carrier, and with only 2 hangar bays (plus a bridge that connects both) with only 1 armor layer the ship weights 34 473 728 KG. It's only the "shell" of the hangar bay (no doors, no reactors, etc) and its wight already is well within the "Super carrier" designation.

What do you think about that?

--AzraelIshi (talk) 12:22, 12 March 2014 (EDT)

I don't like 'hull designation' to begin with and I think it should be removed. People are smart enough to designate their own designs, unless the game itself forces a classification system I am of the belief the section should be removed. --Draygo (talk) 16:09, 12 March 2014 (EDT)


So, shall we remove that section? Since i dont see many people intersted in the wiki, and even less people interested in this page... AzraelIshi (talk) 23:36, 15 March 2014 (EDT)
Sure--Draygo (talk) 23:38, 15 March 2014 (EDT)