Difference between revisions of "Space Engineers Wiki:Community portal"
(replies) |
|||
| Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
::In that case, could I get the redirects at [[Ore]], [[Component]], and [[Tool]] deleted? Since they each have a page history, I can't move the articles from their existing locations to these suggested ones. Thanks! --[[User:Timrem|timrem]] ([[User talk:Timrem|talk]]) 01:56, 22 January 2015 (UTC) | ::In that case, could I get the redirects at [[Ore]], [[Component]], and [[Tool]] deleted? Since they each have a page history, I can't move the articles from their existing locations to these suggested ones. Thanks! --[[User:Timrem|timrem]] ([[User talk:Timrem|talk]]) 01:56, 22 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::[[Template:Delete|There's a template for that]] - [[User:Professor Cupcake|Professor Cupcake]] ([[User talk:Professor Cupcake|talk]]) 18:29, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | :::[[Template:Delete|There's a template for that]] - [[User:Professor Cupcake|Professor Cupcake]] ([[User talk:Professor Cupcake|talk]]) 18:29, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::That template [[:Category:Articles Marked for Deletion|seems a bit ignored]]. --[[User:Timrem|timrem]] ([[User talk:Timrem|talk]]) 23:41, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Suggestion: An intro to the wiki == | == Suggestion: An intro to the wiki == | ||
There are a few assumptions and standards on the wiki that are obvious and barely thought about by experienced users, but are not entirely clear to newbies. My suggestion here is to add some form of "introduction" page, featured prominently on the main page, that explains some of these. - [[User:Professor Cupcake|Professor Cupcake]] ([[User talk:Professor Cupcake|talk]]) 18:39, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | There are a few assumptions and standards on the wiki that are obvious and barely thought about by experienced users, but are not entirely clear to newbies. My suggestion here is to add some form of "introduction" page, featured prominently on the main page, that explains some of these. - [[User:Professor Cupcake|Professor Cupcake]] ([[User talk:Professor Cupcake|talk]]) 18:39, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | :What kind of assumptions and standards do you mean? Gameplay or wiki related? --[[User:Timrem|timrem]] ([[User talk:Timrem|talk]]) 23:41, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
[[Category:Meta]] | [[Category:Meta]] | ||
Revision as of 23:41, 28 January 2015
Contents
Projects
Translation Project
I am marking in here pages that need to be translated, if you are able you are welcome to translate the following pages.
Also keep an eye on Category:Article stubs for created pages that need additional work.
русский
Nederlands
- Controls -> Controls/nl
- Multiplayer -> Multiplayer/nl
- HUD -> HUD/nl
- weapons -> Weapons/nl
- Ships -> Ships/nl
- Electricity -> Electricity/nl
- Raw Materials -> Raw Materials/nl
- Crafting Materials -> Crafting Materials/nl
- Modding Guide -> Modding Guide/nl
- Media -> Media/nl
- FAQs -> FAQs/nl
- Creative Mode -> Creative Mode/nl
- Manual Mode -> Manual Mode/nl
polski
- Controls -> Controls/pl
- Multiplayer -> Multiplayer/pl
- HUD -> HUD/pl
- Components and Tools -> Components and Tools/pl
- Ships -> Ships/pl
- Gravity -> Gravity/pl
- Electricity -> Electricity/pl
- Crafting Materials -> Crafting Materials/pl
- Modding Guide -> Modding Guide/pl
- Media -> Media/pl
- FAQs -> FAQs/pl
- Manual Mode -> Manual Mode/pl
español
français
- Electricity -> Electricity/fr
- Raw Materials -> Raw Materials/fr
- Modding Guide -> Modding Guide/fr
- Media -> Media/fr
česky
- HUD -> HUD/cs
- Ships -> Ships/cs
- Raw Materials -> Raw Materials/cs
- Crafting Materials -> Crafting Materials/cs
- Modding Guide -> Modding Guide/cs
- Media -> Media/cs
Suggestions
- Brazilian Portuguese (ptbr)
Capcha removal
Capcha will be removed for editors that have shown a meaningful contribution to the wiki. At least 5 edits to the main namespace is required for removal. To request removal of your capcha sign below this line by editing the page and pasting the following:*--~~~~
--Tequilaqc (talk) 20:42, 31 March 2014 (EDT) (Granted by --Draygo (talk) 20:46, 31 March 2014 (EDT))
- -- - MegaMacX 03:05, 15 April 2014 (EDT)
Naming Standardization
Having just joined, I don't want to be presumptuous and just make these changes (especially since there may be SMW interactions I'm unaware of), but I've noticed some places where categories/links/labels/ect don't quite match each other. The oddest case is Materials/Raw Materials/Ores: {{Itemnav}} lists Ingots as Materials and Ores as Raw Materials, Raw Materials is a page about Ingots, Materials redirects to Raw Materials, {{Itembox}} on pages about Ingots links to Material (which doesn't exist), and the Main Page links to Crafting Materials and Raw Materials, both of which go to the page about Ingots, and does not link to Ores.
With such finite and well-defined item types in the game, I would think we'd have these pages and their associated categories:
- Ore (Category:Ores)
- Material (Category:Materials)
- Component (Category:Components)
- Tool (Category:Tools)
- Block (Category:Blocks)
If we don't want to call Stone an Ore, we could select a different name for that group of unrefined materials, but we should certainly standardize on something instead of this halfway point where Raw Materials is being used in some places to mean Unrefined Materials and other places to mean Refined Materials.
Side note: I'm a fan of singular Article names and pluralized Category names, in part because it's standard practice, but mostly because it avoids unnecessary pipelinking:
| "this is a Tool." | "these are Tools." | |
|---|---|---|
| page at "Tool" | this is a [[Tool]]. | these are [[Tool]]s. |
| page at "Tools" | this is a [[Tools|Tool]]. | these are [[Tools]]. |
Sure it's not a big difference, and can be avoided anyway by having appropriate redirects, but it's usually simpler just to have Article titles be singular.
I would also think Small ship and Large ship should be moved to Small Ship and Large Ship to match their in-game names. Finally, we seem to be lacking the page Space Engineers, which would describe the game this wiki's all about. Comments? Questions? I can make most of the changes, but am not bold enough to do them without discussion on my first day here. --timrem (talk) 04:44, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- Don't see why you cant. The old pages are the way they are primarily because this wiki started in early alpha. Things weren't set in stone and things were moved around, renamed etc, and the wiki wasn't updated to reflect the in game changes. And hey we can always just revert what you do. If the change betters the wiki and helps make it more accurate and accessible go ahead and make the change. --Draygo (talk) 06:21, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- In that case, could I get the redirects at Ore, Component, and Tool deleted? Since they each have a page history, I can't move the articles from their existing locations to these suggested ones. Thanks! --timrem (talk) 01:56, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- There's a template for that - Professor Cupcake (talk) 18:29, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- That template seems a bit ignored. --timrem (talk) 23:41, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- There's a template for that - Professor Cupcake (talk) 18:29, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- In that case, could I get the redirects at Ore, Component, and Tool deleted? Since they each have a page history, I can't move the articles from their existing locations to these suggested ones. Thanks! --timrem (talk) 01:56, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Suggestion: An intro to the wiki
There are a few assumptions and standards on the wiki that are obvious and barely thought about by experienced users, but are not entirely clear to newbies. My suggestion here is to add some form of "introduction" page, featured prominently on the main page, that explains some of these. - Professor Cupcake (talk) 18:39, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
